- MICROSOFT WORD HOME AND STUDENT 2013 PRODUCT KEY INSTALL
- MICROSOFT WORD HOME AND STUDENT 2013 PRODUCT KEY FULL
- MICROSOFT WORD HOME AND STUDENT 2013 PRODUCT KEY WINDOWS 10
- MICROSOFT WORD HOME AND STUDENT 2013 PRODUCT KEY SOFTWARE
- MICROSOFT WORD HOME AND STUDENT 2013 PRODUCT KEY LICENSE
If it happens, just explain that you’re moving Office from one computer to another. It might be necessary to call Microsoft to get approval but that’s unlikely.
MICROSOFT WORD HOME AND STUDENT 2013 PRODUCT KEY INSTALL
Office 2007/2010/2013 should install and activate with no trouble. Both are necessary to install and activate Office.
Gold Star to Eileen for having both the original Office 2007 CD and the vital Product Key. Even if there’s a problem, it doesn’t hurt to try … it’s not like the Microsoft police will come banging on your door. In practice, you can install and activate Office 2007 on a new computer.
MICROSOFT WORD HOME AND STUDENT 2013 PRODUCT KEY LICENSE
There’s a difference between the official license terms and what works in practice. License and activation of Office 2007/2010/2013
MICROSOFT WORD HOME AND STUDENT 2013 PRODUCT KEY WINDOWS 10
MICROSOFT WORD HOME AND STUDENT 2013 PRODUCT KEY SOFTWARE
It's easy to point the finger at the big software giant with confusing licensing terms, but the "little guy SMB" is big enough to have a purchasing department for crying out loud. I agree with the "buy 100 of those cards, they have no clue" part, but again this isn't Microsoft's problem. It's not the WRONG version, it's the WRONG version for EChapman930's specifications. The version that will save more time and more money will cost more. The version with less features is cheaper, that makes perfect sense. It sounds like EChapman930 did that but his purchasing department doesn't understand the difference between the ranger and a real work truck. At some point the customer has to take responsibility for setting specifications for it's needs and choose what's right for them. Sure it's "tempting" to get the cheaper truck, but it doesn't offer the features you want/need to work. That's like asking why a super duty ford truck costs more than a ford ranger. but we all know that if you walk into a Staples or Best Buy and buy 100 of those cards, they have no clue what you are doing or why or what you should be doing, etc. I think MS is also relying on their vendors (insight/CDW/etc) to help companies purchase the correct thing. For example, the FPK's don't indicate they are tied to a single machine until after you purchase/download and during the install read the EULA, you read the whole thing every time, right? yeah I don't either.
Personally i think they do this to entice very small businesses and home users to 'be legal.' But they don't do enough to educate SMB's of the licensing requirements and advantages of doing things correctly. This *IS* the case with office 2013 professional, where the MOL version is cheaper than the retail box. What I don't understand is why Microsoft "tempts" people into doing this by making one version (in this case the WRONG version) cheaper? The volume license should be the same price or cheaper than this other version. It is clear that what he purchased was not the best solution for his environment for the reasons you listed and the reasons the OP listed.
MICROSOFT WORD HOME AND STUDENT 2013 PRODUCT KEY FULL
With OEM and Full Box you have to manually install each one. With a VL, you're always using the same key and you are allowed to use images to deploy Office. They might be, but you are still limited in the number of machines you can install that copy on, and would have to manually deal with the CD Keys. Dash, CDW is selling individual licenses for Home and Business and I confirmed that it is a few bucks more than the keycard version he bought.